The Chamber was composed of Judge Antoine Kesia-Mbe Mindua (Presiding Judge), Judge Tomoko Akane and Judge Kimberly Prost.
The Presiding Judge read out a summary of the judgment in court, stating, inter alia, that “although Al Hassan was working for a group that claimed to be applying Islamic Sharia, this trial was not about Sharia, or the Muslim religion in general”. The trial concerned the acts and conduct of a man, Mr Al Hassan, acting in a specific context. The Bench examined the evidence to ascertain whether Mr Al Hassan’s responsibility was established beyond reasonable doubt.
The Chamber noted that, after being recruited by senior leaders of AQIM, Mr Al Hassan became a senior member of the Islamic Police, where he took on a leadership role that included organizing police work. The Islamic Police played a pivotal role in the system Ansar Dine/AQIM put in place to commit the crimes. He also participated in the work of the Islamic Court as a member of the Islamic Police, inter alia by writing and signing police reports, taking part in the transfer of accused persons to the Islamic Court and implementing the judgments and sentences handed down by it. He remained a member of the Islamic Police until Ansar Dine/AQIM left Timbuktu. Hence, Mr Al Hassan contributed to the system put in place by Ansar Dine/AQIM.
Mr Al Hassan was convicted, by majority, of directly committing the crimes himself, contributing to them with others or aiding and abetting the commission of the crimes by others, in relation to:
and of contributing to the crimes perpetrated by other members of Ansar Dine/AQIM, in relation to:
The Chamber found that certain crimes of sexual violence had taken place in Timbuktu during the material time. However, Mr Al Hassan was not found to bear responsibility for those crimes and was consequently acquitted of the following charges:
Mr Al Hassan was also acquitted of the war crime of attacking protected objects.
The three judges each appended to the decision a separate, partially dissenting opinion. Judge Kesia-Mbe Mindua appended a dissenting opinion concerning, in particular, the existence of a ground for excluding Mr Al Hassan’s criminal responsibility.
An order setting the calendar of the proceedings for Mr Hassan’s sentencing will be issued shortly. The verdict may be appealed by the Prosecutor or the Defence for Mr Al Hassan within 30 days.
Trial Judgment http://apo-opa.co/4cg64gV
Separate and Partly Dissenting Opinion of Judge Tomoko Akane http://apo-opa.co/3zeSgV4
Separate and Partly Dissenting Opinion of Judge Kimberly Prost http://apo-opa.co/3zeSgV42
Summary read in Court (French) http://apo-opa.co/3XLjYDn
Questions and Answers document: English http://apo-opa.co/3XAvvVT; French http://apo-opa.co/4czpUDt
Photographs of the hearing http://apo-opa.co/4cD5iKt
Audiovisual material:
Verdict in the case of Al Hassan, full hearing, 26 June 2024
Distributed by APO Group on behalf of International Criminal Court (ICC).
For further information, please contact:
Fadi El Abdallah
Spokesperson and Head of the Public Affairs Unit
International Criminal Court
on +31 (0)70 515-9152 or +31 (0)6 46448938
or at fadi.el-abdallah@icc-cpi.int
You can also follow the Court’s activities on Twitter / X http://apo-opa.co/3VW9dwy, Facebook http://apo-opa.co/3XE3Ymk, YouTube http://apo-opa.co/3VXf0C6, Instagram http://apo-opa.co/4eyFbX7 and Flickr http://apo-opa.co/4eIvu8j
Background:
The trial in this case opened on 14 and 15 July 2020 (http://apo-opa.co/3XAUrws). During the trial, the Prosecution called 52 witnesses to give oral testimony, and 22 Defence witnesses appeared in court. The Legal Representatives of Victims, representing 2,196 victims in the case, also called two witnesses. On 8 February 2023, Trial Chamber X closed the presentation of evidence in the case. The Prosecution, the Legal Representatives of Victims and the Defence made their closing statements between 23 and 25 May 2023.
This website uses cookies.