Social News XYZ     

Prof K Nageshwar: Political Tweak Of High Court Verdict (Video)

         హైకోర్ట్ ఇంగ్లీష్ మీడియం వద్దన్నదా? తీర్పు పై రాజకీయాలెందుకు?||Political Tweak Of High Court Verdict||

The Andhra Pradesh High Court quashed two government orders that aim to introduce English as a medium of instruction, in a huge setback to the YSR Congress government’s plans for state-run schools in the state.

A division bench, headed by Chief Justice J.K. Maheswari and Ninala Jayasurya, has delivered the verdict while hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by an Eluru-based petitioner, Dr Srinivas Guntupalli, thro-ugh his counsel Kar-umanchi Indraneel Babu.

In its order, the HC observed that the GO issued by the state government is in contravention of the provisions of section 29(2) of the Right to Educ-ation Act; section 7 (3) and (4) of the 1982 Act; Rules 8 and 23 of the Central Rules as well Rule 25 of the State Rules.

 

Facebook Comments
Prof K Nageshwar: Political Tweak Of High Court Verdict (Video)

About SocialNewsXYZ

An Indo-American News website. It covers Gossips, Politics, Movies, Technolgy, and Sports News and Photo Galleries and Live Coverage of Events via Youtube. The website is established in 2015 and is owned by AGK FIRE INC.

Summary
Title
Prof K Nageshwar: Political Tweak Of High Court Verdict (Video)
Description

హైకోర్ట్ ఇంగ్లీష్ మీడియం వద్దన్నదా? తీర్పు పై రాజకీయాలెందుకు?||Political Tweak Of High Court Verdict|| The Andhra Pradesh High Court quashed two government orders that aim to introduce English as a medium of instruction, in a huge setback to the YSR Congress government’s plans for state-run schools in the state. A division bench, headed by Chief Justice J.K. Maheswari and Ninala Jayasurya, has delivered the verdict while hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by an Eluru-based petitioner, Dr Srinivas Guntupalli, thro-ugh his counsel Kar-umanchi Indraneel Babu. In its order, the HC observed that the GO issued by the state government is in contravention of the provisions of section 29(2) of the Right to Educ-ation Act; section 7 (3) and (4) of the 1982 Act; Rules 8 and 23 of the Central Rules as well Rule 25 of the State Rules.

%d bloggers like this: