There was no incriminating evidence against Shah except a disclosure statement that was not admissible on record and no recovery was effected from Shah on the basis of the said disclosure statement, the court said in its order on Monday.
However, the court ordered framing of charges against Abdul Sami, Zafar Masood, Abdul Rehman and Mohammed Asif under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). There was prima facie sufficient evidence and incriminating material against them, the court said.
Shah was facing charges under Sections 18 (conspiracy), 18B (punishment for recruiting any person or persons for terrorist act) and 20 (punishment for being member of terrorist gang or organisation) of UAPA.
"It is seen that Syed Anzar Shah never travelled abroad and there is no evidence of any 'jihadi' speech delivered by him or any intercepted calls or any other electronic evidence to connect him with any terrorist activity," the court said in its detailed order delivered last week.
The court said mere suspicion cannot form the basis for framing of charges against the accused.
Shah's counsel M.S. Khan said his client was employed as a 'maulavi' at a Bengaluru mosque and did not have links with terrorist groups.
The Delhi Police on June 10, 2016 filed the chargesheet against five accused, who it said were suspected Al Qaeda members. Police also charge-sheeted 12 other operatives who are on the run.
Shah was arrested on January 6 last year from Bengaluru.
(This story has not been edited by Social News XYZ staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Doraiah Chowdary Vundavally is a Software engineer at VTech . He is the news editor of SocialNews.XYZ and Freelance writer-contributes Telugu and English Columns on Films, Politics, and Gossips. He is the primary contributor for South Cinema Section of SocialNews.XYZ. His mission is to help to develop SocialNews.XYZ into a News website that has no bias or judgement towards any.
This website uses cookies.